Environmental Scorecard

highlights

>96%
of our waste
Goes to Recycling
<3.5%
of our waste
Goes to Landfill
<0.5%
of our waste
Goes to Incineration
Achieved
ZERO
WASTE to landfill
in 8 of our plants

ghg emissions

Scopes 1 & 2
(metric tons of CO2eq in thousands)

Scope 3
(metric tons of CO2eq in millions)

energy consumption

Total Energy
(gigajoules)

materials and waste

Total Waste to Landfill
(metric tons)

  1. Absolute Scope 3 emissions increased slightly this year. This year we updated emissions calculations to include the most accurate set of emissions conversion factors. This leads each previous year’s emissions to be lower than previously reported. We expect that 2019 data will adjust as new emissions factors are released for that year. Along with our newly approved Science Based Targets, we are looking into ways for each product platform to decrease the emissions in their product portfolio.

NORMALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL KPIs

  2016 2017 2018 2019
Energy Intensity (megajoules/product) 148.2 144.7 145.4 137.8
Water Intensity (m3/product) 0.0979 0.1016 0.0958 0.0854
GHG Emissions Intensity Scopes 1 & 2 (metric tons of CO2eq/product) 0.0142 0.0139 0.0139 0.0122
GHG Emissions Intensity Scope 3 (metric tons of CO2eq/product) 1.22 1.21 1.19 1.18
Waste Intensity (kg/product) 6.39 6.65 6.55 6.53
Waste to Landfill Intensity (kg/product) 0.2823 0.2685 0.2436 0.2229

GHG Emissions
(metric tons of CO2eq)

18%
Scopes 1 & 2
Emissions reduction
in the last four years

waste GENERATION

  2016 2017 2018 2019
Total Waste (metric tons) 374,702 387,352 363,271 362,083
Total Nonhazardous Waste (metric tons) 369,629 382,021 356,169 355,135
Total Hazardous Waste (metric tons) 5,073 5,332 6,186(3) 6,948(1,2)
  1. We are still on track to meet our targets.
  2. Each region and country has their own regulations on what is considered hazardous waste. As these regulations change, our hazardous waste values adjust to match regulations.
  3. Hazardous waste values for 2018 were restated due to improved data accuracy.

Water Consumption

Water (megaliters) 2016 2017 2018 2019
Municipal water 3,434.84 3,551.37 3,567.37 3,289.88
Groundwater 2,188.31 2,059.71 1,496.68 1,330.69
Recycled water 203.49 164.38 164.72 176.49
Surface water 91.65 280.24 222.19 187.27
Rainwater 26.23 22.33 22.46 33.99

Water Discharge

Destination (megaliters) 2016 2017 2018 2019
Wastewater on-site chemical physical treatment 946.40 1,003.78 999.86 1,034.091
Wastewater on-site biological treatment 252.29 290.93 291.32 306.541
Wastewater off-site treatment 1,809.13 1,844.71 1,888.07 1,710.73
Wastewater surface water 523.65 496.86 500.64 605.422
Wastewater evaporation 116.85 97.78 131.00 135.90
  1. Increases in on-site water treatment volume in 2019 are due to a shift in the treatment methods from off-site to on-site as sites build their capacity to properly and efficiently treat water at their sites.
  2. More water in general is being released to surface water after being properly handled, which allows the water to be returned to the source. This reduces water depletion and positively impacts ecosystems that rely on those water sources.
2018
2019
67% 72%
% Sites
ISO 14001
Certified
2018
2019
9% 19%
% Sites
ISO 50001
Certified